US Business News

Mission in Motion: How Strategy Shapes Student Success at Marian Middle School

By: Matt Emma

At Marian Middle School, leadership is not just about structure and strategy—it’s about ensuring every decision aligns with the mission. Principal Sierhah Price understands that the heart of running a mission-driven school lies in both honoring that mission and evolving it to meet the needs of students and staff. As the only all-girls, faith-based middle school in the St. Louis region specifically serving girls from under-resourced communities, Marian operates with a strong commitment to preparing students for life beyond middle school. But doing so requires strategic leadership, team empowerment, and a sustainable approach that can adapt to evolving needs.

Since becoming Principal, Sierhah Price‘s influence on Marian has focused on aligning internal operations with its core mission. “It’s easy to implement change for the sake of change, but every shift we’ve made has to serve a higher purpose,” she says. From replacing outdated uniforms with new, well-deserved uniforms that foster pride to refining admissions processes that support a more committed school community, each decision is part of a broader strategy aimed at building a cohesive and sustainable learning environment.

Her approach begins with the people. Hiring is not just about filling a teaching position; it’s about identifying how a candidate’s skillset can contribute to the school culture. “In a mission-driven space, you’re not just hiring a math teacher. You’re hiring someone who can nurture, model resilience, and grow into a community leader.” Price positions staff members to operate at their best by helping them evolve professionally. “People don’t come here to simply clock in and out. They come here to help our students grow, and grow themselves in that process.”

Price is intentional about hiring educators who are passionate and continually learning. Marian’s academic programming reflects this. With the adoption of a new tech-forward math curriculum and the school-wide use of Naviance to foster individualized high school, college, and career planning for each student, Marian’s academic evolution is rooted in the idea that the students Marian serves are already acting as adults because of the circumstances they face. “I’ve never been a fan of saying we’re preparing students for the ‘real world,’ because they’ve been forced to grow up way beyond their years. Growing up facing poverty and succeeding takes grit, persistence, and profound strength. Our job is to make sure they’re prepared for what’s next, not just right now.”

Mission in Motion: How Strategy Shapes Student Success at Marian Middle School

Photo Courtesy: Sierhah Price

That readiness includes leadership development. One of the programs Price is most proud of is the Investment Club, which gives students the tools to understand finance, entrepreneurship, and accountability. She believes public speaking and presence are often learned aversions, so Marian creates space for students to lead—as ambassadors, daily assembly leaders, chapel speakers, or buddies on campus tours.

“We don’t make girls speak in front of an auditorium on day one,” she says. “We teach them to introduce themselves, to recognize their strengths and opportunities, to apply intentionally, and even to respond to rejection. That’s leadership.”

The impact is tangible. One student who participated in the Investment Club wrote a handwritten letter to the instructor asking how to open an investment account for her growing small business. Another student with a nail business shifted her mindset from a short-term hustle to a longer-term plan after feedback from Price. The lessons extend beyond the classroom.

Community connection is another area where Price brings business acumen and mission alignment together. “I treat our students as our clients. We think about the experience we’re delivering every day and whether it reflects who we are.” That customer-first mindset is why Marian continues to prioritize second languages, the arts, and physical education—classes that are often cut in other institutions. “We think about what inspires us to do our own best work as adults, and apply those same standards to the students,” she adds.

“I don’t see these programs as nice-to-haves. They are integral to our core values,” she says. Events like the Poetry Slams, Hispanic Heritage Month, Black History Month, and Daddy Daughter basketball games aren’t just fun moments. They reflect Marian’s culture and intentionality about helping each student see herself through a lens of self-value. “We build pride through visibility, celebrating the uniqueness of the individual, and belonging.”

Mission in Motion: How Strategy Shapes Student Success at Marian Middle School

Photo Courtesy: Sierhah Price

Under Price’s leadership, Marian also expanded athletics to ensure students feel energized and supported throughout their day. “We went from a 10-hour academic block model to a schedule that respects the whole child. We want girls to move, express, and thrive. As adults, we know movement is key to self-regulation and remembering our coping skills when things get tough. Children need—and deserve—these same tools.”

This mission-aligned leadership extends to faculty, too. Price is the first principal to proactively ask for 360 feedback; she also scales professional development to better serve the school’s diverse demographics. She creates space for staff to be heard and supported. “I try to be approachable without losing sight of the bigger picture. It’s a balance of staying grounded and staying strategic.”

Perhaps one of the most profound aspects of her leadership is her ability to separate identity from outcomes. “The biggest lesson I’ve learned is not taking every decision personally,” she says. “In this role, I have to make decisions aligned with the mission, even when they’re challenging. I can’t operate based on feelings; I have to lead with clarity.”

That clarity has yielded results—not just in student performance and faculty retention, but in the culture as well. Marian girls return after graduation not just to visit, but to give back. “They’ll tell us, ‘I didn’t realize what a cheat code Marian was until I got to high school.'”

What drives Price isn’t just a passion for education. It’s a calling to ensure that girls who often go overlooked are seen, heard, and prepared. “I’m not here just because I love kids,” she explains. “I’m here because I’ve seen systems fail our communities. Here, I know the mission is real, and with business acumen and a healthy dose of humility and humanity, the impact is generational.”

As Marian continues to grow, Principal Sierhah Price is leading with a simple but powerful belief: that strategy, compassion, and accountability can coexist. And that, in a mission-driven school, they must.

Exploring the Shift From Degrees to Skills in Workforce Development

The way employers assess candidates has shifted noticeably, with increasing focus on skills over degrees. In many industries, the specific abilities a worker brings to a role can be more telling of success than academic credentials alone. Fields such as information technology, advanced manufacturing, and healthcare support have shown growing interest in hiring individuals based on their demonstrated skills rather than their formal education.

In the technology sector, software developers often learn new programming languages and tools on the job or through intensive training programs. Employers increasingly value practical coding proficiency and problem-solving abilities, which can be shown through coding challenges or portfolio projects. An applicant with a strong track record in creating functional applications or contributing to open-source projects may be preferred over one with a traditional computer science degree but limited real-world experience.

Manufacturing plants expanding their automation capabilities look for operators who understand robotics and control systems. These skills can be acquired through technical schools, apprenticeships, or industry certifications rather than a university degree. When one factory sought to introduce programmable logic controllers into its workflow, technicians trained in hands-on programs proved effective at managing the transition, while degree holders without practical experience needed additional training.

Healthcare support roles provide another clear illustration. Certified nursing assistants or medical technicians gain their credentials through focused certification programs rather than long academic courses. Hospitals often prioritize candidates who have completed relevant vocational training and demonstrated patient care skills over those with unrelated degrees.

This shift also relates to labor market realities. When shortages occur, companies adjust hiring criteria to include candidates without degrees but with proven competencies. A logistics firm expanding its warehouse capacity found that many skilled forklift operators had been trained through company-run programs, allowing faster hiring than relying on degree-qualified candidates.

How Does the Emphasis on Skills Affect Individuals’ Career Paths?

Individuals encountering this trend find that alternative pathways into and within careers are becoming more viable. Those who entered the workforce through nontraditional means, such as trade schools, bootcamps, or self-study, can access roles that once required a degree.

A worker who began in a retail environment but developed skills in inventory software and supply chain management through internal training was able to move into operations management. This progression hinged on the ability to demonstrate practical knowledge and leadership capabilities rather than educational background.

Similarly, career changers can leverage skills-based hiring to transition into new fields. Someone with experience in hospitality who learned digital marketing through online courses and freelance projects could compete for roles in marketing departments. When interviews included tasks such as drafting social media posts or analyzing campaign data, this candidate’s abilities stood out.

However, candidates must effectively showcase their skills. Creating portfolios that demonstrate work outcomes, obtaining industry certifications, and completing relevant assessments often matter more than listing degrees on a resume. A warehouse worker applying for a logistics coordinator role might highlight familiarity with inventory management systems and workflow optimization rather than educational history.

Micro-credentials or digital badges focusing on narrow skill sets have emerged as alternative qualifications. A person pursuing data analytics might accumulate certifications in data visualization tools or programming languages without completing a formal degree program.

What Adjustments Are Employers Making to Support Skills-Based Hiring?

Employers embracing skills-based hiring often rewrite job descriptions to prioritize competencies over degrees. Instead of stating “Bachelor’s degree required,” postings might list “proficiency with CRM software” or “experience managing customer inquiries.”

Practical assessments increasingly supplement interviews. For instance, a customer support role may involve responding to simulated client emails to evaluate communication style and problem resolution. In technical roles, candidates might complete hands-on exercises replicating daily tasks.

Companies also invest in upskilling current employees. A manufacturing firm may train production workers to operate new machinery rather than recruit externally, recognizing that skill development within the team can improve retention and performance.

Some organizations collaborate with vocational schools and training providers to create curricula aligned with their needs. This partnership ensures graduates have the skills relevant to the company’s operations, creating a pipeline of job-ready candidates.

Despite these adjustments, challenges remain. Employers must ensure fair assessment practices to reduce bias. Structured interviews, standardized testing, and blind evaluations help make skills evaluation more equitable.

How Are Educational Systems Evolving to Support Skills Development?

Exploring the Shift From Degrees to Skills in Workforce Development

Photo Credit: Unsplash.com

Education institutions have responded by expanding vocational and technical training options. Community colleges and specialized training centers offer certificates in fields such as welding, medical assisting, and software development, designed to align with employer needs.

Many institutions integrate practical experience into their programs. Apprenticeships, internships, and project-based learning provide students with real-world exposure that complements classroom instruction.

The rise of modular and stackable credentials allows learners to acquire specific skills incrementally. An individual interested in IT might complete a series of courses in network management, security, and cloud computing, each providing a certification that builds toward broader competence.

Online learning platforms also contribute to skill development by offering accessible courses and certifications. Working professionals can learn at their own pace and demonstrate new skills without disrupting their careers.

Assessment methods include portfolio reviews, practical exams, and competency-based evaluations. These tools seek to measure actual ability rather than rote memorization.

What Are the Broader Implications of Prioritizing Skills in Workforce Development?

Emphasizing skills in workforce development can broaden access to employment for people from diverse educational and socioeconomic backgrounds. Those who face barriers to traditional degree programs may find new pathways to stable careers.

This inclusivity can contribute to a more diverse workforce, which research associates with improved problem-solving and innovation. Broader participation also supports social mobility.

Economically, aligning training with labor market demand helps address skill shortages and mismatches. Regions that adapt workforce policies to focus on skills may experience more dynamic growth and resilience.

However, focusing on skills requires balancing immediate job readiness with foundational knowledge. Without broad educational grounding, workers might struggle to adapt to future changes or complex problem-solving requirements.

Cooperation among employers, educators, and policymakers remains crucial to ensuring skills development is accessible, recognized, and effective in supporting career growth.

Ongoing data collection on employment outcomes, wage growth, and job satisfaction can inform future workforce strategies and help maintain this balance.

Negotiating Real Estate Fees: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know

Real estate fees refer primarily to commissions paid to agents or brokers involved in facilitating the sale or purchase of a property. These fees typically represent a percentage of the property’s sale price and cover services such as marketing the property, arranging showings, negotiating offers, and managing paperwork through closing. While common practice in many U.S. markets is for the seller to pay the commission from sale proceeds, the exact structure can vary by region and by agreement between the parties.

The typical commission rate in many areas ranges between five and six percent of the sale price, which is often split between the listing agent (representing the seller) and the buyer’s agent. Because the seller pays these fees, buyers usually do not see direct commission charges; however, the costs may be indirectly reflected in the property price. Understanding these fees is important because they influence net proceeds for sellers and, indirectly, purchase costs for buyers.

How Can Buyers Approach Real Estate Fees in Negotiations?

Although buyers generally do not pay real estate commissions directly, they may still benefit from clarity and, in some situations, negotiation around fees. When a buyer engages an agent, the agent’s commission is often sourced from the seller’s payment. However, buyers working with agents outside of a seller’s listing arrangement might negotiate compensation terms, including flat fees or hourly rates, especially in markets with diverse agent compensation models.

Some buyers opt to discuss commission splits upfront to understand if any portion of the fees might affect their out-of-pocket expenses. For instance, in a case where a buyer’s agent is working with a seller who has offered a lower commission split, the buyer and agent might need to clarify whether additional fees apply.

In competitive markets where sellers receive multiple offers, buyers should consider how commission expectations influence pricing and contract terms. Adjusting the purchase offer can impact the final commission the agents receive, but this depends on local customs and contract details.

Maintaining transparent communication with the buyer’s agent about fee structures helps avoid misunderstandings and enables the buyer to evaluate options thoughtfully.

What Strategies Might Sellers Use to Negotiate Real Estate Commissions?

Sellers often hold more direct leverage in negotiating real estate commissions since the fees come out of their sale proceeds. Negotiation usually begins when selecting a listing agent, where sellers can discuss commission rates, fee structures, and included services.

In some cases, sellers compare commission rates from multiple agents or brokerages to identify offers that balance cost with service quality. Some agents may propose lower commission percentages in exchange for exclusive contracts or limited service packages. It is important for sellers to understand how a reduction in fees might correspond with fewer marketing efforts, fewer open houses, or less comprehensive transaction management.

Another negotiation point is how the commission is split between the listing agent and the buyer’s agent. Sellers may encounter situations where adjusting the split encourages buyer agents to show the property more actively. In private sales or transactions without a buyer’s agent, sellers may negotiate a single commission rate or flat fee.

Clarifying all terms related to fees, such as payment timing and what services are included, helps avoid disputes and ensures sellers know what to expect throughout the process.

How Do Market Conditions Influence Real Estate Fee Negotiations?

Market dynamics play a significant role in determining how negotiable real estate fees may be. In seller’s markets, where demand exceeds supply and properties sell relatively quickly, agents may be less willing to reduce commissions since the probability of sale is high and competition among agents is reduced.

Conversely, in buyer’s markets, where supply outpaces demand and properties may stay listed longer, sellers may seek to negotiate lower commissions to reduce their expenses. Agents may offer more flexible commission structures to attract listings in slower markets.

Regional practices also influence fee arrangements. Some areas have established norms around fixed percentage fees, while others may have a range of options including tiered commissions, flat fees, or fee-for-service models. For instance, in urban markets with multiple brokerages and higher competition, variations in commission structures may be more common.

Understanding local market conditions, consulting with multiple professionals, and reviewing recent sales data can provide sellers and buyers with context useful for fee negotiations.

What Are Important Considerations When Negotiating Real Estate Fees?

Clear communication and understanding of the services included in a commission are critical for both buyers and sellers. Commission amounts may reflect not only the time agents spend on marketing and showing properties but also support services such as contract preparation, coordinating inspections, and guiding clients through closing procedures.

Both parties should review agent agreements carefully, noting how commissions are calculated, any additional fees, and how disputes will be handled. Transparency about compensation ensures alignment of expectations.

Legal and ethical guidelines require agents to disclose their fees and avoid conflicts of interest. Buyers and sellers should feel comfortable asking questions and requesting detailed explanations of fee arrangements.

Recognizing that the lowest commission rate does not always correlate with the best service can be important. Evaluating agent experience, marketing reach, and negotiation skills alongside fees can contribute to more informed decisions.

How Do Real Estate Fees Impact the Overall Transaction?

Real estate fees influence the financial outcomes for sellers and indirectly affect buyers. Sellers receive the sale price minus commissions, closing costs, taxes, and other expenses. As commissions are typically deducted from sale proceeds, higher fees reduce the net amount sellers receive.

Buyers may see commissions reflected in listing prices since sellers often factor fees into their asking price. This relationship means buyers should consider market conditions and negotiation opportunities on price as part of the overall cost analysis.

In some transactions, fee structures may be adjusted to accommodate unique circumstances, such as new construction sales or investment properties, where commissions may be structured differently. Both parties should be aware of how fees fit into the total financial picture.

Negotiating real estate fees requires careful consideration of local market customs, agent services, and individual transaction circumstances. Both buyers and sellers benefit from understanding common practices and engaging in transparent discussions to align expectations and support successful real estate transactions.