US Business News

House Republicans’ Struggle to Unify Amidst Global Crises

Internal Struggles Threaten Republican Speaker Selection

In the intricate web of American politics, House Republicans find themselves entangled in a web of internal conflicts, the likes of which could significantly impact their ability to select a new speaker. The urgency of this decision is underscored by the unfolding global crises, particularly in Israel and Ukraine, which lay bare the profound challenges of governing when the majority party is in disarray.

House Republicans, who have often been characterized by their unity in the past, now face the daunting task of mending gaping divisions within their own conference, a process made all the more challenging due to the gravity of global events. The stakes couldn’t be higher, as their ability to navigate these internal fissures will determine not only their leadership but also their capacity to provide effective governance.

The Ongoing Battle Between Moderates and Hardliners

At the heart of this internal strife is the ongoing battle between moderates and hardliners within the Republican party. The conflict is made even more complicated by the presence of two declared candidates, Majority Leader Steve Scalise and Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan. Their candidacy hinges on their ability to manage and sway the hardliners who were instrumental in the ousting of Kevin McCarthy, thus contributing to the perception that the United States struggles to govern itself, let alone lead in a world beset by turmoil.

The schism between these factions is a reflection of the deeper ideological fault lines that have become more pronounced in recent years. While some Republicans demand substantial spending cuts, they seem to overlook the reality that Democratic control of the Senate and the White House necessitates a degree of compromise. This ideological rigidity has far-reaching implications, with the previous speaker, Kevin McCarthy, falling victim to the need to secure Democratic votes to keep the government open.

A Glimpse into the Candidates: Scalise and Jordan

The internal strife has brought the candidacies of Steve Scalise and Jim Jordan into sharper focus. Both candidates are facing the immense challenge of uniting a party divided along ideological lines. The ability to secure the necessary overwhelming support within the Republican conference is a formidable task, particularly given the tightrope walk that the Republican party now finds itself on.

Scalise and Jordan each bring their unique attributes to the table. Scalise is known for his vocal support of former President Donald Trump and his experience in party leadership. Jordan, on the other hand, has been a strong advocate for Trump and has been active in various conservative caucuses. Their approaches reflect the larger struggle within the party as they seek to bridge the gap between hardliners and moderates.

The Challenging Path to Speaker Selection

The upcoming internal secret ballot elections on Wednesday will be pivotal in determining who will become the Republican nominee for the second-highest position in the presidency. However, the significant external crises seem to have done little to quell the internal conflicts. The possibility of either Scalise or Jordan winning the necessary support in an eventual floor vote of the full House remains in doubt, adding to the complexity of the situation.

This predicament is further exacerbated by the slim majority held by the House GOP. A candidate for the speaker’s position can only afford to lose four Republican votes and still secure the gavel in a full House vote. This precarious balance of power has made the situation even more daunting, as Democrats have shown little inclination to intervene and rescue the Republicans from their internal struggles.

Implications for Governance and Global Consequences

The implications of this internal turmoil are not limited to the confines of the Republican party. The House GOP’s inability to unite and make a decision has broader ramifications for the country’s governance and its ability to respond to pressing global challenges. Time is running out to avert another government shutdown, which could occur by the middle of the next month.

The ongoing paralysis threatens the country’s capacity to respond to critical international events. The Hamas assault on Israel and Ukraine’s battle for sovereignty hang in the balance, dependent on whether the next aid package can make its way through the House.

This complex situation calls for astute political maneuvering and leadership. A new speaker will have to decide whether to amend the rules regarding the ousting of the speaker, a contentious issue that was offered as a concession to hardliners. Moreover, the prospect of another government shutdown looms, which would have a cascading impact, potentially affecting troops’ salaries and public services.

In essence, the House Republicans’ ability to resolve their internal conflicts and choose a new speaker is a matter of great import. It carries not only domestic implications but also has far-reaching global consequences. Regardless of the outcome, the country watches with bated breath as this political drama unfolds, knowing that the challenges faced by the Republican party have broad implications for the future of governance in the United States.

Corporate America and gun violence, a difficult relationship

Corporate AmericaIn 2018, the United States was jolted by a mass shooting at a high school in Florida.

The incident prompted corporate America to strengthen gun control regulations.

Dick’s Sporting Goods, for example, has stopped selling semi-automatic, assault-style firearms in its stores.

Citigroup restricted business clients’ access to buy weapons.

Following catastrophic shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio in 2022, Walmart suspended sales of handgun ammunition.

Yet, corporate America’s gun-control attitudes have shifted.

With the recent Nashville tragedy, most firms, like most of corporate America, kept silent on weapons.

A change in policies

In recent years, some well-known firms have updated their gun-related policies.

Any attempt to prevent gun violence was usually greeted with intense resistance from Republican lawmakers opposed to gun laws and corporations making a political statement.

According to gun safety campaigners, businesses are responsible for safeguarding their employees and customers from gun violence.

They have pushed retailers to remove firearms off their shelves and instead help communities affected by gun violence.

Moreover, activists are pushing companies to avoid making political contributions to politicians who have ties to the NRA.

According to activists, bank transactions with gun or ammunition manufacturers have been suspended.

Some companies, notably gun manufacturers, have declared financial reasons for opposing gun control legislation.

Other businesses, on the other hand, do not believe it is their duty or role to comment on the gun problem.

Others are preferring to keep silent for fear of political ramifications and the wrath of gun rights activists.

According to Julian Zelizer, a Princeton University history and public affairs professor and CNN political pundit, guns are the most pressing problem.

“In a polarized era, most companies still prefer to avoid these sorts of questions,” he said.

While CEOs agree on the importance of gun control, Zelizer remarked that they do not want to be involved in an issue that may cause a customer backlash.


Businesses have been recognized for their contributions to gun control legislation.

Republican officials, for example, exerted pressure on banks and financial institutions that attempted to cut ties with the gun industry.

Texas passed legislation in 2021 forcing banks to underwrite the state’s municipal bond market while pledging not to turn away gun clients.

Additionally, in 2022, more than 50 House Republicans devised legislation to prevent ‘boardroom gun control,’ which prohibits enterprises that receive government funding from turning down weapons companies.

In March, Visa, Mastercard, and Discover delayed plans to develop a new merchant category code for US gun shops due to political pressure from Republicans.

The legislation’s purpose was to detect potential mass shooters and gun traffickers.

Yet, two dozen Republican attorneys general recommended the businesses to abandon the plans.

According to officials, implementing the sales rule for gun retailers would violate gun owners’ constitutional rights while also potentially violating consumer protection and antitrust laws.

Moreover, state legislators filed measures barring firms from applying the new regulation.

Read also: Banks in Europe suffer stocks decline from banking crisis fears

Corporate responsibility

Businesses and experts are arguing whether corporate America should take a more proactive approach to gun safety.

Paul Argenti, a corporate communication professor at Dartmouth University’s Tuck School of Management, developed a framework for businesses that want to get involved in “hot button” issues.

He recommended that businesses ask the following questions:

  • Is the issue tied to their corporate strategy?
  • Do they have the potential to make a difference on it?
  • Is there potential backlash to taking a position?

“Companies, unless they are connected, should not be speaking out,” he said.

“Companies are not social entities.”

But, in recent years, corporate America has attempted to reframe the purpose of a firm as something other than serving shareholders.

The Business Roundtable is a non-profit organization that represents CEOs and attempts to influence legislation.

In 2019, the organization declared that enterprises should benefit all stakeholders, including:

  • Customers
  • Employees
  • Suppliers
  • Communities
  • Shareholders

The remark contradicted Nobel Laureate economist Milton Friedman’s economic ideas, which said that firms that raise profits and serve shareholders benefit society.

According to Igor Volsky, executive director of Guns Down America, the concept would force corporations to take the lead in decreasing gun violence.

“Whether you’re a business that works directly with gun manufacturers, sells guns or are a grocery store, gun violence comes to your front door,” said Volsky.

“As a business, you have a responsibility to keep your customers, employees, and communities safe.”

Volsky went on to explain that it was in the economic interests of corporate America to help reduce gun violence because of the business risks involved with shootings and the impact of gun violence on communities.

Companies including Dave & Buster’s, Del Taco, and Walmart have warned investors that gun violence might affect their bottom lines.

“I’m not arguing they need to solve the social issue of gun violence,” Volsky noted.

“I am arguing they have a business incentive to solve for the cost of gun violence.”

Donald Trump still the Republicans’ favorite for 2024

Donald TrumpDonald Trump became the first past or current president to be charged last week.

After much deliberation, the Manhattan grand jury reached its conclusion.

That is also just one of numerous high-profile Trump lawsuits.

A surprising rally

With a slew of indictments against him, one would believe Donald Trump’s political goals are jeopardized.

Nonetheless, many Republican leaders have been hesitant to criticize him.

They have instead targeted Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who initiated the accusations against Trump.

Likewise, betting markets continue to imply that Donald Trump is a lock for the Republican candidacy in 2024.

Improved prospects

The indictment tipped the globe on its axis, ushering in an unusual position with a political reality that may shift.

Donald Trump’s popularity is most likely due to three factors:

  • With the indictment hanging over his head, Trump’s polling advantage in the GOP primary for 2024 has grown in the previous month.
  • Republicans feel the probes are politically motivated.
  • Most Trump supporters are unconcerned about his general election viability.

Likewise, surveys from Fox News, Monmouth University, and Quinnipiac University indicate an improvement in Donald Trump’s Republican primary prospects.

In March, surveys showed Trump winning by double digits.

Furthermore, the former president acquired a leg up on his closest challenger, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who has yet to launch his campaign.

Over February, Trump established a 12-point lead.

Divided sentiments

The Quinnipiac survey was released last week, and the findings were revealed.

Just 18% of registered Republican voters thought Trump’s allegations in the purported New York hush money scheme were serious.

58% of people thought they weren’t.

With the indictment becoming a reality, there may be a movement in thinking, but it may not be as substantial as it appears.

The Quinnipiac survey found that the majority of Republicans did not feel Alvin Bragg was objective.

Virtually every Republican (93%) believed his case was driven by politics, as did the majority of people (63%).

When it comes to any indictment against Donald Trump, Republicans appear to be on his side.

A recent Marist College survey questioned respondents which of the several Trump investigations they thought was more fair or a “witch hunt.”

Read also: Donald Trump indicted, caught off guard by the news

The 2020 elections

The Manhattan lawsuit isn’t the only source of contention; Donald Trump has also been tied to the Capitol Riot.

Most Republicans feel his efforts to reverse the 2020 election outcome did not constitute a felony.

According to polls, the majority of Republicans feel Donald Trump’s efforts were just.

The majority of people thought Joe Biden only won because of voting fraud.

The bigger picture

Republicans’ belief that the lawsuits are politically motivated is merely a small part of the issue.

Another consideration is how Republicans perceive Donald Trump in the context of the larger general electorate.

The Republicans believe he is innocent, but also believe his legal concerns will be a barrier in the general election because people feel the probes are fair.

The polls say that an agreement on issues is more important than electability when it comes to Republican primary candidates.

According to a CNN survey, Republicans and Republican-leaning independents ranked defeating Biden as a higher priority than agreement on policies, with a 59% to 41% margin.

Trump supporters had similar feelings, with 61% believing that issue agreement should take precedence above electability, while 39% disagreed.

The figures demonstrate a significant departure from what occurred in the 2020 Democratic primary.

By March 2020, 73% of Biden backers advised voters to prioritize electability above issue consensus.

In other words, Biden’s pitch to Democratic voters was stronger than Trump’s case to Republicans.

A new hope

Despite the fact that most Republicans believe that other prospective contenders have a better chance of unseating Biden, Trump remains in the lead.

According to a February Marist survey, 54% of Republicans believe that someone other than Trump would provide the GOP a greater chance of recapturing the White House in 2024.

Yet, Republican voters may not have erred in 2023.

Notwithstanding the probable electability issues, Donald Trump appears to be developing an advantage over Joe Biden in general election surveys in the early part of the 2024 cycle than he did during the 2020 cycle.

Yet, the same survey found that DeSantis does somewhat better against Biden than Trump, which is consistent with what most Republicans believe.

Donald Trump indicted, caught off guard by the news

Donald TrumpAccording to two sources, Donald Trump is charged with more than 30 counts of business fraud in a Manhattan grand jury indictment.

The indictment is the first time a current or former president has been charged with a felony in US history.

On Tuesday, Donald Trump is due to appear in court.

The indictment was filed under seal and will be made public soon, but the charges have not been released.


The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office was investigating Donald Trump’s suspected participation in a hush money payment scheme and cover-up involving adult film star Stormy Daniels.

The infidelity story broke almost a decade ago, but the hush money claims broke right before the 2016 presidential election.

Although grand jury proceedings are confidential, a source said a witness talked for more than 30 minutes before choosing to indict Trump.

The decision

With the decision decided, the American political system is certain to adapt and venture into uncharted terrain.

The fact that a previous leader is facing criminal charges while campaigning for president for the second time is one for the history books.

Yet, following the indictment, Donald Trump delivered a statement in which he claimed political persecution and high-level election interference.

“I believe this Witch-Hunt will backfire massively on Joe Biden,” said Trump.

“The American people realize exactly what the Radical Left Democrats are doing here. Everyone can see it.”

“So our Movement, and our Party – united and strong – will first defeat Alvin Bragg, and then we will defeat Joe Biden, and we are going to throw every last one of these Crooked Democrats out of office so we can MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

Getting the news

According to one source, Donald Trump was surprised by the grand jury’s decision to charge him.

Initially, Trump expected an indictment, but he anticipated it would take weeks.

“Is this a shock today? Hell yes,” said the anonymous source.

Meanwhile, Bragg’s office was in touch with Trump’s legal team.

“This evening, we contacted Mr. Trump’s attorney to coordinate his surrender to the Manhattan DA’s Office for arraignment on a Supreme Court indictment, which remains under seal,” Bragg’s office said on Thursday.

“Guidance will be provided when the arraignment date is selected.”

Read also: Donald Trump rally in Waco defines extremism

The campaign and witch hunt

Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in 2024 opened a new phase when he committed to run despite the criminal charges.

Trump has often called the investigations into him a “witch hunt.”

He has attempted to sway public opinion by portraying himself as a victim of Democratic prosecutors’ political probes.

As the indictment date came, Donald Trump asked his supporters to protest his detention, mirroring his appeals to action in the 2020 election, when he attempted to avenge his defeat.

He has long avoided legal ramifications in his personal, commercial, and political actions, resolving many private civil claims and paying his way out of Trump Organization problems.

He was impeached twice as president by the Democratic-led House but was not acquitted by the Senate.

Despite the fact that he was not charged, the Trump Organization was convicted of multiple tax fraud violations in December.

Trump supporters and Republican opponents attacked the Manhattan district attorney’s office for the indictment in 2024.

“I think the unprecedented indictment of a former president of the United States on a campaign finance issue is an outrage,” said former Vice President Mike Pence on Thursday.

“It appears to millions of Americans to be nothing more than a political prosecution that’s driven by a prosecutor who literally ran for office on a pledge to indict the former president.”

GOP comes to Trump’s defense

Kevin McCarthy, the House Speaker, has committed to investigate the event.

Republicans in Congress, on the other hand, came to Trump’s rescue, criticizing Bragg on Twitter and accusing him of pursuing a political witch hunt.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan criticized the claims and demanded that Bragg testify before Congress about the investigation.

Senator Ted Cruz called the indictment “totally unprecedented,” alleging that it escalates the judicial system’s weaponization.

One Republican, on the other hand, believed in the legal system.

“I believe in the rule of law,” said Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska.

“I think we have checks and balances and I trust the system.”

“We have a judge. We have jurors. There is appeals. So I think in the end, justice will be done.”

“If he’s guilty, it will show up. But if not, I think that will be shown too.”

Pete Buttigieg admits he made mistakes in East Palestine response

Pete ButtigiegA month ago, a Norfolk Southern train derailed, releasing toxic chemicals into East Palestine, Ohio.

Despite the fact that the leak has been curtailed, there has been substantial criticism of the response, particularly of Pete Buttigieg.

The US Secretary of Transportation has made every effort to assist with the tragedy, but he is aware of his shortcomings.

The news

According to Pete Buttigieg, his reaction to the train accident was inappropriate.

He acknowledges that the criticism is fair but contends that critics are harsh.

“It’s really rich to see some of these folks – the former president, these Fox hosts – who are literally lifelong card-carrying members of the East Coast elite, whose top economic policy priority has always been tax cuts for the wealthy, and who don’t know their way around a TJ Maxx if their life depended on it, to be representing themselves as if they genuinely care about the forgotten middle of the country,” said Buttigieg.

“You think Tucker Carlson knows the difference between a TJ Maxx and a Kohl’s?”

Pete Buttigieg acknowledged his shortcomings, including a prior trip to East Palestine.

Despite months of transportation issues, he said he did not anticipate the political fallout from the train disaster.

Despite making mistakes, Pete Buttigieg replied to his critics.

The transportation secretary maintained that most of the problems he’s been chastised for are just marginally related to his job.

He had little control over the railway derailment.

Calls for resignation and doubts

Some Republicans, including Sen. Marco Rubio, have called for Buttigieg’s resignation, blaming him for “deliberate stupidity” in failing to respond to the event sooner.

Nevertheless, Democrats have not been bashful in voicing their concerns.

West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin stated:

“People have to have a confidence – and they have more confidence when they see leaders.”

He also remarked: If Buttigieg feels he is being effective, he must make that decision.

An anonymous Democratic member of Congress chimed in, saying:

“Buttigieg’s appeal in 2020 as a fresh new face – like [Jimmy] Carter, [Bill] Clinton, or [Barack] Obama – who wanted to get past the divisions and move the nation forward.”

“It’s sad to see him become a partisan brawler on Twitter and cable news. He’s become the most polarizing member of Biden’s cabinet.”

Notwithstanding the calls for his resignation, White House spokesperson Andrew Bates stated that Pete Buttigieg is not in danger of being dismissed.

Yet, every transportation problem has spurred discussion about how it may be Buttigieg’s ruin and derailment of his future ambitions.

So far, the most recent and challenging obstacle in his career has been the train derailment.

Read also: Lori Lightfoot out of race for Chicago mayor reelection

Underestimating the situation

Pete Buttigieg contends that attending the site sooner would have made no difference in the Department of Transportation’s response because his department was involved in very little of the accident response.

Yet, he thought that it might have been better and assisted East Palestinian civilians in seeing a well-known political figure demonstrate that they were being heard.

Buttigieg also remarked that he had previously underestimated how much time he would devote to consumer relations and customer service.

“Sometimes people need policy work, and sometimes people need performative work,” he said.

“And to get to this level, you’ve got to be ready to serve up both.”

Visiting Ohio

Since taking office two years ago, Pete Buttigieg has expressed worry about train safety.

He was also keeping a close eye on the derailment in East Palestine before it became a political issue.

Buttigieg first conducted research that led him to assume he would not visit.

When he did, it was a terrifying experience.

“I could get technical readouts, information about the response,” said Buttigieg.

“But I think it was important to hear and see how the community was responding, what they were worried about, just a different way that you can sense on paper.”

“It just feels different,” he said of the sight of twisted metal and the scent of chemicals.

Pete Buttigieg wants to put the tragedy’s indignation into action, which might take years owing to government red tape.

“People who have sided with the rail industry again and again and again are suddenly acting like rail safety advocates,” he noted.

“But it also creates the chance to call them to the table and say, ‘Ok, if we’re serious now, let’s do this.'”

Biden’s documents presents a hurdle for Democrats as Republicans go off in uproar

Biden’s documents: The government’s national security and legitimacy might be severely impacted by the release of confidential information from a former vice president who is currently the President.

These records could have private information about past operations, diplomatic contacts, and military tactics that enemies could use against the country.

The disclosure of such documents may damage the former vice president’s character and legacy and spark a political storm.

Furthermore, imagine someone who had access to the records when the previous Vice President was in office disclosed them.

In such instances, it may cast doubt on the security procedures in place at the time.

The government must take action to stop the unauthorized disclosure of secret information and to punish those who leak them accountable.

The latest disclosure of President Joe Biden’s documents raises the possibility of a severe political dilemma.

The news

The discovery of Biden’s documents at his previous offices might undercut the Donald Trump case, for which he kept classified material.

On Thursday, the White House revealed that classified records from Joe Biden’s tenure as vice president had been discovered at his home in Wilmington, Delaware.

Republicans who believed Trump was being treated unfairly by the probes into classified papers at Mar-a-Lago were fueled by the revelation.

Biden’s documents were discovered in a storage facility in his garage and an adjacent room, according to a White House statement.

On Thursday, he disclosed that he was working with the DOJ and that the files were in “locked storage.”

The GOP reacts

Currently, Donald Trump is seeking to prevent the National Archives from transferring the records as required by law.

Joe Biden’s difficulties are opening the door for the pro-Trump House majority despite Trump’s efforts.

The GOP is already putting together a research structure to back up its assertion that the Democrats have infiltrated the federal government and turned intelligence personnel against conservatives.

They want to contrast the behavior of current President Joe Biden and his inner circle with former President Donald Trump.

Read also: Allen Weisselberg receives 5 month jail sentence

A boomerang effect

Joe Biden’s critiques of how Trump handled classified information are now likely to come back to haunt him and raise accusations of hypocrisy.

Each case will be considered according to its legal merits.

Additionally, the idea that Trump may be charged with a crime for behavior resembling Biden’s makes charges politically difficult.

The circumstance supports the former President’s allegations that his unsuccessful 2024 presidential campaign was intentionally scuttled.

Nevertheless, the revelation of the secret papers may give his campaign new life.

Republican uproar

Republicans may use Biden’s documents to construct a more extensive political case, which may cause problems for the White House, according to Rep. Jim Jordan, the chair of the House Judiciary Committee.

He addressed the apparent double standard on Thursday by inquiring about where the Biden raid was.

Nevertheless, he omitted to disclose that the FBI search from last year was carried out via a court-approved warrant.

Trump also postponed turning over the documents while claiming fraudulent ownership.

Once the records became public, Biden’s attorneys swiftly transmitted them to the National Archives.

Even if there is a big difference legally, Trump and his Republican allies, who are already raising a stir, are likely to ignore it.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican, urged a special prosecutor to investigate the Biden document matter.

Effect on Democrats

Democratic attempts to capitalize on the Republican crisis have been drowned out by Biden’s documents, as House Speaker Kevin McCarthy demands further concessions to preserve his diminishing majority.

The new House GOP stands by Rep. George Santos despite the changes in his credentials and biography, which have led to his New York party demanding his resignation.

Democrats on Capitol Hill are forced to defend themselves because of Biden’s documents, despite the abundance of GOP scandals.

Significant differences

There are certain distinctions in how Trump and Biden handled their confidential document concerning similar issues between them.

When Biden’s documents were discovered, the President’s lawyers contacted the National Archives and swiftly turned them over.

Meanwhile, the FBI raided Trump’s Florida residence after he stalled and refused to turn over the papers.

Additionally, the documents contrast with one another.

There were only a handful of secret documents in Biden’s office instead of hundreds at Mar-a-Lago.

Despite the differences, the GOP still accuses Biden of being a hypocrite for criticizing Trump.


Biden’s document scandal eats away at efforts to hold Republicans accountable